Contrast of the Two Articles Essay Example for Free

Contrast of the Two Articles EssayWhen comparing the two articles, much comparison was on the view point of social responsibility but the argument of the two articles focuses more than on aspect of business morals. Drucker spends far more time finding out the nastying of business ethics, and as stated earlier he breaks it down into more of different types of samples and other meanings than just the general view of business ethics.Again, Freidmans view was more on social responsibility being the term that faces and encourages business ethics, but what I found arouse was a little excerpt from George, (1999) in his titled book Business Ethics, here George is explaining the issues that approach business ethics, and even though this quote was used earlier in the writing, he states some point out that self-interest would still require a business to obey the law and adhere to basic object lesson rules, because the consequences of failing to do so could be very costly in fines, loss of licensure, or company reputation. The n adeptd economist Milton Freidman was a leading advocator of this view (George, 1999). If this is the case, then it is noted that Freidman was a view point on that ethical decisions are made on the basis of consequences and not just on their social responsibility to their company and their actions. Now one could argue in depth that it is ones social responsibility to adhere to basic moral rules and the consequences that follow. But the contrast is that while Drucker believes that business ethics comes from ones social responsibility to himself and his kingdom,Casuistry, Business ethics undoubtedly is a close parallel to casuistry. Its basic thesis that ethics for the ruler, and especially for the business executive, has to express social responsibility is exactly the starting point of the Casuist. But if business ethics is casuistry, then it will not last long-and long before it dies, it will have become a tool of the business execut ive to justify what for other people would be wrong behavior, rather than a tool to restrain the business executive and to impose tight ethical limits on business (Drucker, 1970). Conclusion So what does this all mean? My view on the contrast is that one is using the philosophy that business ethics is based on decisions and behavior from Druckers standpoint, to the contrast that, business ethics is based on consequences of certain business situations. Business ethics is broader in its term and uses more than just right and wrong in business aspects. thither are far more things that cause business ethics to be a stable-ford in the business world.Ones behavior and responsiveness to situations is a main component to business ethics but that cant be the determining factor when trying to pursue the actual meaning and how it affects a business. And even when social responsibility is a main component to business ethics and is quite equal on some aspects of the term, there will endlessly be the argument that if it leans towards someones responsibility, is the decisions that are being made ethical, and if so is it more towards the persons responsibility to society or to ones business?References1. Carroll, A. B. , Buchholtz, Ann K. (2006) Business society Ethics and stakeholder management Mason, Ohio South-Western ISBN 0324225814 2. George, Richard T. de (1999). Business Ethics. Prentice Hall Publishing, ISBN 01307977723 3. Drucker, P. (1970) What Is Business Ethics New York, N. Y. New York Times clip pp. 32-33, 122-124, 126